Second Committee Speeches & Interventions

Statement by Senator Ms. Anisa Zeb Tahirkheli, Delegate of Pakistan to the Second Committee on Agenda Item 100: Globalization and Interdependence (11 November 2003)

Mr. Chairman,

Let me at the outset thank the Secretary-General for his report under this agenda item.

2. My delegation would like to associate with the statement made by the representative of Morocco on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

Mr. Chairman,

3. Globalization means different things to different people. For some, it is a panacea for all economic difficulties being faced by the developing countries. For others, it is a new form of economic and cultural, and eventually political domination.

4. We believe that globalization is a reality, which cannot be wished away. Propelled by economic and trade liberalization, it has resulted in enhanced economic growth, a remarkable expansion in international trade and global investment flows. Driven by Information and Communication Technologies, it has brought about a high level of connectivity between regions and peoples.

5. Paradoxically, globalization has also increased marginalization of some of the less developed societies. This is manifested in the increasing digital divide, rising income inequalities and concentration of economic power through mega mergers. The underlying reasons are;

One, increased trade and investment flows, witnessed in recent years, have bypassed the majority of developing countries. The share of the LDCs in world exports remains under 0.04 percent. Investment flows are highly concentrated in few countries - African countries being the marginal recipient – only $ 6 billion in 2002. Their external debt continues to grow.

Two, the gains from liberalization have been manifestly asymmetrical in favour of the developed countries. Liberalization has proceeded apace in areas such as information technology and telecommunications which are of greater economic interest to developed countries. On the other hand, areas of trade in which developing countries have a particular interest, such as textiles, agriculture, and the movement of natural persons, are being liberalized at a much slower pace.

Three, globalization has been accompanied by an accentuation of income disparities amongst and within countries with obvious negative implications for the welfare of large segments of populations. There is, in many countries, an erosion of the middle classes with inevitable negative implications for the stability of democratic systems.

Four, given the increasing integration of national economies, it is clearly beyond the capacity of individual countries to manage the process of globalization by themselves. Even the developed countries have not yet been able to ensure that globalization proceeds at a pace and in directions where the “creative destruction” of inefficiencies is not transposed into a runaway train of economic depletion and social deprivations.

Mr. Chairman,

6. Recognizing these realities, the United Nations Millennium Declaration proclaimed to make globalization “a positive force for all”. The Monterrey Consensus called for taking appropriate measures in order to make globalization “fully inclusive and equitable”. Similarly, the Doha Ministerial Meeting of WTO committed to “place the needs and interests of developing countries at the heart of multilateral negotiations”. The Bretton Woods Institutions have also realized the importance of taking corrective measures to reduce the sufferings of the developing countries in this globalized world.

7. Unfortunately, the developing world continues to face many complex and multidimensional challenges. Globalization continues to accentuate their disadvantaged position, and widen the economic inequalities among countries and regions. It is negatively affecting their over-all process of development.

8. It is becoming increasingly evident that if we want globalization to work for all, the economic, financial and social challenges confronting the humanity will have to be addressed in a coherent manner. Genuine globalization would require that the developing countries be properly integrated into the global economic system. It would require opening the developed countries markets to freer cross-border flows of goods, technology, capital, information and people. Resolving the unsustainable debt burden of the developing countries, filling the capacity and resource gaps and enhancing their participation in the international decision-making and norm setting would be essential for globalizing development.

9. Unfortunately, the current international development cooperation lacks such elements. Trade, investment and financial flows are mostly concentrated within the developed blocs. There is no transfer of resources from developed to the developing countries. The reverse is in fact the case. Globalization, therefore, benefits only a small part of mankind - the part that could do without them - at the expense of the large expanse of humanity that needs them.

10. It is, therefore, important that we devise ways and means to manage globalization, in order to maximize its dividends and minimize its hazards for the poor and the already marginalized segments of the international society. Measures will have to be taken to ensure that the forces unleashed by globalization serve social ends and promote equitable development of all peoples. In moving towards such a “governance of globalization”, the following measures are essential:

First, priority must be given to strengthen the capacity of multilateral institutions to address the issues of trade, finance and development in an “integrated” manner. Global monetary reform is one issue which has to be considered in tandem with rules regarding trade, and in the overall context of the development impact of measures in these areas.

Two, the institutions responsible for rule making in the “globalization” process i.e. the IMF, WTO and World Bank, should be made more democratic, transparent and inclusive. This will require democratization of the decision-making processes of these institutions. Also, the most universal and democratic international organization, the United Nations, must live up to its mandate to oversee the realization of “better living standards for all in greater freedoms” in all countries. Appropriate mechanisms have to be devised for the greater involvement of the representatives of civil society, including private business and consumer groups, in debates relating to economic and social development issues.

Three, a serious attempt needs to be made to address the perennial issues of debt, access to technology, and development finance. Control over these by the developed countries is not a legitimate component of their competitiveness in the globalized economy. Unless there is progress on these systemic and fundamental “equity” issues, it is doubtful that any significant advance can be made to improve the social conditions of the majority of the world’s population. This would require faithful implementation of the commitments made at the International Conference on Financing for Development.

Four, rules regarding international trade must take into account the great disparity in the ability of developing and developed countries to complete in global markets. These rules must also ensure symmetrical benefits for all countries, with trade liberalization proceeding in a balanced manner in areas of interest to both developed and developing countries.

Five, in addressing the linkages between globalization and sustainable development, particular focus must be placed on identifying and implementing policies that simultaneously promote the three components of sustainable development. Social concerns, including labour standards should be dealt with objectively in relevant international fora such as ILO. These concerns should not become a vehicle for disguised protectionism.

Mr. Chairman,

11. Finally, as long as the asymmetries and imbalances persist in the global system, there is no reason to expect a different outcome in a globalizing world. No framework whether it is globalization, marketization, liberalization or interdependence can promote development unless it is democratically governed and geared towards development. To this end, the international community must consider urgent action in the above mentioned areas.
 

I thank you, Mr. Chairman.

* * *